Disclaimer: Measurement has been carried out with a pair of Shure Olive foam sleeves. This pair, owned by a good friend named V.K., has been revitalized by cleaning the nozzle & adding a new pair of dampers. Enjoy!
Along with SCL5, SE530, which was released in 2001, was Shure's top-of-the-line IEM, featuring triple balanced armature drivers. And in 2010, Shure released a revised version, SE535. However, other than the detachable cable with MMCX connection, the sound quality of SE535 seemed to be more or less the same as the original.
CON: The high frequency bandwidth goes only up to 15 kHz & non-linear impedance characteristic.
ON SECOND THOUGHT #1: As there is no high frequency to begin with, SE535 is quite free from insertion depth-related issues & sleeve-related issues, as long as the IEM is not barely situated at the ear canal entrance.
ON SECOND THOUGHT #2: Just like Ultimate Ears Triple.Fi 10 Pro, it is advised to stay away from source devices with output impedance higher than 1 Ω, as even an addition of 33 Ω yields a sharp -6 dB dip at 6 kHz.
ON SECOND THOUGHT #3: Surprisingly, SE535 benefits from a damper modification. My personal recommendation is 2200 ~ 3300 Ω, as they closely turn the tonality of SE535 into that of Triple.Fi 10 Pro. If anybody finds the stock sound to be little too boring, this is the way to go for. Unfortunately, even with the damper modification, the high frequency bandwidth does not change at all.
ON SECOND THOUGHT #4: FYI, if any of you SE535 owners want to experience the sound quality of SE535 Special Edition, specially designed for the Japanese market, simply pop in a pair of 330 Ω gray dampers. Rly?? See it for yourself:
Left: Shure's official comparison chart // Right: My "emulation" of the comparison
Where is the CSD graph? !!!!! :(((
ReplyDeleteThanks!
DeleteNo problem! I kinda forgot to add them LMAO
Deletethis is quite unexpected. i used to own one and i found them very sibilant and muddy
ReplyDeleteIt is sibilant if your insertion is shallow. I am not sure about muddiness though.
DeleteAfter several auditions I also personally found them muddy. Maybe it is the lack of high frequency extension? However there is little music detail at such high frequencies anyway.
DeletePerhaps it is the combination of a slight hump at 100 hz and downward slope from 1Khz?
Perhaps, or you simply prefer brighter tonality like me!
DeleteCould you measure the frequency response when inserted shallow then??
DeleteBecause of its shape I don't deep insertion can be achieved with stock olive, only possible with Comply P-series.
You may refer to "ON SECOND THOUGHT #1"
DeleteI think the graph below the "CON:" part is what you're asking for.
ReplyDeleteGood review! Thanks for replacing my damper!
ReplyDeleteYou are welcome, brother. :D Your SE535 has been shipped back today.
DeleteGood to know. I'll post on head-fi how it sounds.(Unless you don't want me to)
DeleteOf course I want you to. LOL Please do so!
DeleteYup. I'll also link your blog to the review!
DeleteHey rin i wouldnt call SE535 special edition a scam. The graph you provided is not in the treble region where it is explicitly stated that
ReplyDelete"A newly tuned acoustic network delivers enhanced high frequency performance."
IF there is only also cut off at 15KHz then you can call it a scam :P
Ok, calling se535se a "scam" might be little too harsh. How about a "hoax", then? :D
DeleteThe cut off is still there, the bandwidth of the driver simply remains, the best they could do is just underdamp it a bit for more treble precense. A hoax indeed, quite shameful.
ReplyDeleteso the change in the FR range by 0.5 kHz at the high end of the spectrum according to the manufacturer is non existent ???
DeleteI thought that from 19khz (standard) to 19.5khz (special edition) would yield a real performance of 15khz to 15.5khz .....
You're right actually, think there's a 0.5k increase in bandwidth. Problem is that its hardly noteworthy and does not fix the treble extension as claimed. If it at least reached 17k like some single BAs can then perhaps, but this is just a hoax
Deleteyeah i agree with that. At least 17. for example I can hear up to 18.
DeleteIt does cost more money to paint the shells red...
ReplyDeleteHey, that's what fine art is.. Right?
DeleteHow do you extract and push in new dampers?
ReplyDeleteI have never done so before and i have no clue on how exactly pull the thing out of the shell.
Thanks for the answer.
According to Etymotic Research: http://i.imgur.com/2vZB0TI.png
DeleteYou definitely need a damper(filter) extraction tool from Etymotic Research.
is it possible to accomplish that with small pliers? the one that women remove eyelashes? ....
DeleteYou may try, but I can't guarantee.
DeleteI just did it with the stock wax loop. Just be careful, and it's not that hard.
DeleteI posted tips on pulling the dampers out on the link below. http://www.head-fi.org/t/663273/more-sq-improvement-than-cable-dampers#post_9423128
DeleteWow, thanks a lot for the answers. Gonna try it out. :)
DeleteWould this also work with the se315 model?
DeleteHere is my review of how each dampers sound. Just few more hours of listening, and I'll post on how the grey filter sounds. http://www.head-fi.org/t/663273/more-sq-improvement-than-cable-dampers#post_9423128
ReplyDeleteCan't wait for the impression, brother. Can't wait..
DeletePosted picture. I feel like I need more time for impressions though.
DeleteHello, I want to ask if you could help me with my westone 3, the vocals seems to be sibilant specially when some part of the lyrics of the songs with "S" that just sounding like a sharp sssssssssss, and its quite uncomfortable, maybe you can help me whats the right dampers if I'm going to buy a set of these?
ReplyDeleteHi there,
ReplyDeleteI currently own the Se535 LtdJ, is there a difference between the grey filters used in knowles and the ones used in the red Shure? As inside in the knowles it is made of metal, and it seems metal tubes are superior as seen in the fit ear 334 To Go. Also would that be the reason why the knowles white filter sounds better than the white filter used in the stock normal 535? Many thanks.
Jonathan.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete