Search This Blog

Loading...

Saturday, April 14, 2012

The effect of headphone cables: SONY MDR-EX1000


Introduction

As mentioned previously, SONY shipped the US version of MDR-EX1000 with RK-EX600, a regular oxygen-free-copper(OFC) cable of MDR-EX600, instead of RK-EX1000, a 99.99999% (7N) OFC cable in order to keep the price competitive in the US market. However, because of this, headphone enthusiasts began to report the audible differences of the two cables, and of course, it was most likely that the 7N was superior in sound quality.

Is that so? In order to verify the above claim, I purchased the RK-EX1000SP from Japan for ¥4,410. From Tokyo, it took about a week for the shipment to get here in California.

Compared to the MDR-EX1000's original 7N OFC cable, RK-EX600's built quality is quite flimsy. It's definitely thinner, and the plug is made of out plastic, instead of metal; definitely looks cheaper.



Test methods

SONY MDR-EX1000 is to be measured with a regular OFC cable, a 7N-OFC cable, and finally a random non-OFC cable, while the physical placement of drivers are to be unscathed in order to eliminate such  measurement deviations. Should any differences occur, they are to be reproduced back utilizing a binaural recording method to be ABX-compared.



Test Results


Impedance

RK-EX600: there is about 1 Ω difference, with RK-EX1000's being lower, due to the fact that it is 7N & thicker in diameter.


Frequency response
RK-EX600 is 0.2 dB lower than the 7N. With the non-OFC cable, the difference is about 0.3 dB. Fluctuations above 10 kHz are due to re-positioning caused while changing the cable.



Time-domain characteristics






Spectrogram




Harmonic distortion




Subjective assessment

ATTENTION: In order to accurately reproduce these binaural recordings, listeners must use a flat diffuse-field equalized headphone, such as Etymotic Research ER-4B and STAX Lambda PRO with ED-1. The accuracy of the reproduced result can not be guaranteed otherwise.

Reference sample

http://www.4shared.com/music/8X-Fjkrq/The_Lion_King_-_01_-_Charmen_T.html

7N: http://www.4shared.com/music/eLv7LAmv/
OFC: http://www.4shared.com/music/abyYIpAK/
non-OFC: http://www.4shared.com/music/6a2J3MMz/


Conclusion

It is evident that the 7N-OFC cable's electric conductivity is superior compared to the regular OFC cable. Yet, let us not forget: MDR-EX1000's impedance is 32 Ω, which is quite high enough to withstand the damping effect of most of the portable sources' output impedance: Practically, the effect of 1 Ω difference would be infinitesimal. If this difference should be discerned by the ABX-comparison, the one must have a hell of hearing ability, or have what-so-called a golden-ear.



4 comments:

  1. NOT SURE IF TROLLING
    Or Nobel Prize-level science

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd say you clearly deserve the former.

      Delete
  2. Wouldn't it be possible that this is simply the difference between two sets of earphones? I've seen two sets of the same exact model with more varying specs. I bet you could take another identical cable and get slightly different results... no?

    ReplyDelete