Search This Blog

Friday, August 23, 2013

STAX SR-003 MK1: Electrostatic in the Ear

Disclaimer: This loan has been provided by my friend, vAsurada. This particular pair is SR-003 mkI, not mkII. Measurement has been carried out at 6 mm away from the reference plane with its headband removed.


Released as a Pro-bias version of SR-001 mkII in 1997, STAX SR-003 features small form factor compared to other full-sized headphone from the manufacturer for portable usage, and a 1.5 μm diaphragm, which is the same thickness as the diaphragm of current Lambda models.

And the question is, can this IEM perform as good?






PRO: There are quite a few: Very quick transient characteristic, warm-bass, wide bandwidth, low distortion, and linear frequency response with a downward-slope of about -2 dB/oct.

CON: Fitting is quite tricky, due to the IEM's large housing.

ON SECOND THOUGHT #1: Although SR-003's optimum insertion depth is about 6 mm away from the reference plane, due to its uber-low acoustic output impedance, any insertion depth yields more or less the same linearity along the frequency spectrum.

ON SECOND THOUGHT #2: Modifying SR-003's acoustic damping scheme radically re-shapes the frequency response. While a foam piece inserted in the nozzle suppresses peaks in the mid-range, blocking the rear vent interferes damping of the driver by a great degree.


ON SECOND THOUGHT #3: Surprisingly, the rear duct of SR-003's headband is a part of the IEM's acoustic damping system. By adjusting the volume of air behind the driver, the headband duct cuts off 4.5 kHz while boosting 6 kHz. Consequently, the frequency response becomes similar to that of SR-Lambda series.

ON SECOND THOUGHT #4: Again, SR-003 is virtually free of insertion-depth related issue. Period.

ON SECOND THOUGHT #5: Modifying the rear cup portion only affect the mid-range damping characteristic.

ON SECOND THOUGHT #6: As previously analyzed, ED-1 equalizer, which is made as SR-Lambda Professional's proprietary diffuse-field synthesizer, effectively turns Basic and Signature into Hi-Fidelity headphones. And when ED-1 is coupled with SR-003, the IEM becomes even more linear than it already is.

ON SECOND THOUGHT #7: Whether the IEM is coupled with ED-1 or not, the sound quality is still of top-notch. As its electroacoustic performance characteristic is so great, STAX SR-003 becomes the very first headphone that goes on my favorite list.

11 comments:

  1. Rin,
    Your favorites list?
    I will now consider t In Ear Speaker!!!
    Thanks, Jim

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is Etymotic ER4 still on top of the list??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When choosing my first and last IEM i was considering er4 and sr003. I ve never heard either. I chose er4. All these years i thought i chose right. It is funny to find out i was wrong.

      Delete
    2. Haha, don't worry Vitaly. ER4 is still a solid contender with great sound quality. I'd still choose ER-4B for binaural simulation.

      However, it is not on my fav list for three reasons:

      1. ER4 is not flat in the sub-bass range; IMHO lacking is worse than bloated.
      2. High frequency extension is too short.
      3. And most importantly, ER4 is extremely prone to complications derived from insertion-depth & bore-resonance.

      Delete

      Delete
    3. I did have a long fight with Er4 against its sibilance as I just could not put it deep enough. Then someone (kudos to you!) on this blog suggested getting shure olives and they did improve things a lot. But yes, now HF extension seems too short which took away a bit of sparkle from ER.
      On the other hand a whole bunch of people did criticise SR003 for being too boomy (i think) and that it sounds boring. were they just deaf or plain wrong...

      Delete
    4. A good seal is vital for SR-003. If the IEM is not sealed well, polarization resonance(which rings of course) appears somewhere in the low frequency range, and its frequency varies depending on how much of leak is introduced.

      Delete